Last
Tuesday, evangelical pastor Rick Warren appeared on CNN’s “Piers Morgan
Tonight” to discuss the controversial question whether people are born gay or
develop gay attractions.
With
the recent political campaign we have heard this topic covered in the media as gay
activists are pushing for same sex marriage to be legal. As of November it is
legal in 9 different states.
After
listening to Rick Warren’s statement I realized that at the core of the debate
is our understanding of what it means to identify as gay. We need to talk about
this issue and not just fight the legal battles. Talking helps plant the seed
that will start people thinking about what it means to have gay attractions
versus acting upon those attractions.
The
first step in talking about it is to make a clear distinction about what sexual
orientation means, as Peter Sprigg explains in “Debating Homosexuality:
Understanding Two Views.” Sexual
orientation is an umbrella term for three different aspects of sexuality: sexual attraction, when one is sexually
attracted to someone of the opposite sex, the same sex, or both; sexual conduct, whether the individual chooses
to act upon that attraction; and self-identification,
whether the individual thinks of himself as “gay,” “lesbian,” “bisexual,” or
“straight.”
Gay
lobbyists assume that all three are consistent with one another, but based on
the research, that is clearly not true.
Should
an individual who feels attracted to someone of the same sex (because of the environment
he or she has been exposed to, peer pressure, loneliness, or some internal
self-identification) act upon these attractions? No, not necessarily.
We
all have tendencies that aren’t in accordance with our God-given nature, but it
doesn’t mean we choose to engage them. As Pastor Rick Warren explained, “I
have all kinds of feelings in my life and it doesn’t necessarily mean that I
should act on every feeling. Sometimes I get angry and I feel like punching a
guy in the nose. It doesn’t mean I act on it.”
So,
what if someone responds, “I was born this way, I cannot change my attractions”?
To this we can answer, first, that the research has not found any “gay gene” or
related biological issue that proves someone is born with gay attractions, but
that it’s
a result of a complex mix of developmental factors. For instance, MARRI
research shows that a young woman is more likely to experiment with a lesbian
partner if
she was raised in a non-intact family.
Second,
as Pastor Rick mentioned, we can all be drawn to something that is not good for
us or that is not according to our nature, but that doesn’t make it right. He gave
the following example: “Sometimes
I feel attracted to women who are not my wife. I don’t act on it. Just because
I have a feeling doesn’t make it right.”
Those
individuals who feel same-sex attractions should be treated with the same
respect and kindness we treat any person, but that does not mean we should
embrace their actions. We must fight to defend an understanding of sexuality
that is in accord with our human nature and human dignity.
In
order to do that we must first understand the core of homosexuality:
attractions exist, but attractions
are not actions. This is especially important
for helping adolescents who are confused by a false explanation of same-sex attraction
or caught up in homosexual behaviors. Young people should be educated about the
moral nature of every decision they make, including their sexual decisions.
I understand you're an intern but your paragraph is full of grammatical errors and it's quite embarrassing to read. And they expect us to take the Marriage and Religion Institute seriously? Sounds more like a big joke.
ReplyDeleteAnd on your last paragraph, a little twist to the story: Replace "homosexual" with the word "heterosexual" and "same-sex" with "opposite-sex" and listen to how ridiculous your advice sounds. Homosexuality doesn't equate sex just as being heterosexual doesn't necessarily imply sex.