MARRI Interns
A recent study published by the Brookings Institute on the relationship between marriage and economics overlooks the causal importance of marriage in economic growth. When discussing the lamentable recent decline in middle class income, the article rightly fingers macroeconomic features as culpable. But marriage is also a decisive factor in the economic health of families, and the distinction between marriage and macroeconomics is not as stark as might be inferred from this study. “Globalization, technological changes, and changes in labor market institutions” must be accounted for in any diagnosis of the recent global economic malaise, but the omission of marriage from such a study results in a myopic diagnosis and a deficient prescription.
A recent study published by the Brookings Institute on the relationship between marriage and economics overlooks the causal importance of marriage in economic growth. When discussing the lamentable recent decline in middle class income, the article rightly fingers macroeconomic features as culpable. But marriage is also a decisive factor in the economic health of families, and the distinction between marriage and macroeconomics is not as stark as might be inferred from this study. “Globalization, technological changes, and changes in labor market institutions” must be accounted for in any diagnosis of the recent global economic malaise, but the omission of marriage from such a study results in a myopic diagnosis and a deficient prescription.
The Brookings study
posits a unidirectional model of causation: macroeconomic stagnation is
responsible for the decline in marriage, and macroeconomic stability (not
familial stability) is the only solution to the problem: "Rather than focusing
on changing values, a more effective approach to addressing both poverty and
marriage may be to improve economic opportunities for all Americans." Thus the
author of a New York Times article about this study may be forgiven for
echoing that same causal logic: "The rich are different from you and me: they're
more likely to get married." But this analysis is unidimensional and therefore
deficient. The social science data is clear in its insistence
that marriage itself improves the economic performance of the partners. A
preferable, though no doubt more controversial, headline would read ,"Marrieds
are different from you and me: they're more likely to be
rich."
Our Fiscal Crisis: We
Cannot Tax, Spend, and Borrow Enough to Substitute for
Marriage, a recent piece of
original MARRI research, highlights the numerous economic benefits of marriage,
including a 0.9% increase in income per year for men after they marry. Another
piece of original MARRI research entitled The Divorce Revolution Perpetually
Reduces U.S. Economic Growth shows that "the rate of change in earnings
year over year are consistently higher for men in intact marriages than among
single or ever-divorced men." Both of these studies emphasize that the
causal link between marriage and economic success is the reverse of that implied
by the Brookings study, and those seeking to resolve the nefarious economic
straits faced by Americans today embark upon a fool's errand if they continue to
ignore these salutary benefits of monogamous, stable marriage.
No comments:
Post a Comment