Amanda Brennan, Intern
For
many couples today, having children has become an ART, or an act of Artificial
Reproductive Technology. This method, which contributes to more than 1 percent of all infant births, involves the combining of
egg and sperm outside the body
through various procedures. In most cases a woman’s eggs are retrieved
surgically after superovulation, and a man’s sperm is collected via
masturbation or a medical procedure. The two are then combined in a petri dish
to form new life. From this moment on, the fate of the embryos is unclear. The couple
has several options: implant into the biological mother, implant into a
surrogate, donate to another couple, dispose of, donate to research, or freeze.
Cryopreservation, or the freezing of excess embryos,
is a common practice at virtually all of the 443 identified fertility clinics
throughout the United States. Presently, it is believed that over 400,000 human
lives are suspended in “concentration cans” of liquid nitrogen. In all
the hype of solving infertility and creating genetically enhanced children,
life is being destroyed (an estimated 6½ embryos are lost for
every live birth in
IVF) and embryos are being imprisoned in a “man-made limbo.” The evils of
concentration camps went unnoticed until after the damage
was done in WWII, and the same may be true for the injustice of cryopreservation
that is occurring throughout the world today. The question of what to do with
embryos that are abandoned or unwanted has gone unanswered in the U.S., but in
some European countries those unclaimed embryos are often cleaned out and
destroyed to make room for newer ones coming in. Little thought has been given
to the consequences of ART methods on future society as a whole, most
importantly on the family.
Through
procedures such as IVF the fundamental norm of creation is manipulated. No
longer do people beget children,
instead they manufacture them,
casting the sexual act between a man and a woman aside. The separation between
procreative and recreational sex continues. As ART procedures grow in
popularity more and more children will be detached from their biological
parents. Originally, only homologous artificial fertilization was practiced,
but now heterologous artificial fertilization is acceptable. This opens the
door for single parenthood, homosexual parenthood, etc., in the meantime
gradually devaluing the institution of marriage. For instance, a child could be
created from the egg and sperm of two strangers, gestated by another woman, and
then raised by two completely different people. Up to five individuals can
contribute to the creation and upbringing of a child, not to mention the third-party
intervention of scientists and medical professionals throughout the process. As
MARRI research points out, children thrive when they grow up in an intact
married family. In 2009, 45.8 percent of children experienced family
intactness.
Some ART procedures provide a child with a stable home between a married man
and woman, but many others provide the opportunity to redefine marriage and
childbearing unlike ever before.
As science
continues to progress, we must not forget the famous words of Dr. Seuss, “A
person's a person, no matter how small” (Horton Hears a Who). Humans
must evaluate the repercussions of their actions before creating injustices such
as frozen embryos. There are ways to treat infertility that respect the dignity
of the human person, that value life at even its smallest stages, and that
safeguard marriage and the sexual act. It must not be forgotten that children
have a fundamental, inalienable right to be born and raised in an intact
family, not stored in a refrigerator.
No comments:
Post a Comment