The
Associated Press (AP) wrote an article in the Christian Science
Monitor entitled, “Cohabitation before marriage? It’s no greater divorce
risk.” The article used a study by the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, part of the US National Institute of Health, which sought to
discover “trends and group differences” between marital statuses of those aged
15 to 44 years. When analyzing the AP article to the actual study, the article
turns out to be rather misleading.
The
title the AP used implies that divorce is not more likely for those who
cohabitated before marriage than for those who maintained chastity. However, when
going to the CDC study itself, this statement is found false. The study
examined marriage survival of men and women in 5-year intervals from 5 to 20
years. In every interval, those who did not cohabitate with their future spouse
had a greater chance of marriage survival than those who did cohabitate. The probability between
these categories is often close in comparison, but the title blatantly
misrepresents the facts. It would have been accurate to claim that in some of
the year intervals, the difference was statistically insignificant. The study
even specifies, “Looking at 20 years duration, women who had never
cohabited with their first husband before marriage had a higher probability of
marriage survival (57%), compared with women who had cohabited with their first
spouse before marriage.”
There
are more examples than just comparing the title, and discerning readers should
examine both texts. This is yet another example of the media attempting to
alter our culture’s perception of marriage, and to make cohabitation more
palatable. However, even with their quoted data, marriage still stands. For
further critique of the AP’s paper, check out Glenn Stanton’s article in National Review
magazine. Also, for numerous publications and research
that support marriage, please visit the Marriage and Religion Research’s website.
No comments:
Post a Comment